Are alcoholic beverages good for you?

The Skinny: The evidence is unreliable and it is being misread. The evidence actually suggests that even moderate alcohol consumption is bad for you. But the evidence is of the most unreliable sort.

Those of us who like to drink have no doubt taken notice of reports that up to four alcoholic drinks per day is good for overall health (women, it is suggested, should drink a little less than men). Alcohol, it appears, reduces risk of death from the most common killers of modern civilization: “Renaud reported a 30% reduction in death rates from all ailments from two to three glasses of wine a day, a 35% reduction from cardiovascular disease, and an 18% to 24% reduction from cancer.”

Here’s the problem with these reports. The health improvements from alcohol consumption cited here – and just about everywhere – take as their baseline those who consume NO alcohol. They then compare the baseline to the health outcomes of people who consume alcohol more frequently – grouping them together according to how many grams of alcohol the people generally consume in a day. This leads to the creation of a J-shaped curve – where the verticle axis is mortality and the horizontal access is quantity of alcohol consumed. It looks like this:

j curve

As you can (sort of) see, those who consume up to four drinks a day have the same overall mortality rate as those in the no-alcohol group (all the way to the left, jammed up against the vertical axis).

What you can also see is that those who consume very-little-but-some-alcohol (like 1-3 drinks per WEEK) have the lowest overall mortality by far. Which is an odd finding, suggesting there is something very wrong with the no-alcohol group. Which there probably is.

While there are some healthy people who choose to never drink, many in the no-alcohol group are undoubtably recovering alcoholics. Recovering alcoholics tend to be in very poor health. And, it is plausible, that some others in this group don’t drink precisely because they are sickly and find alcohol overwhelming.

A less problematic comparison can be made using a different baseline – very light drinkers, the 1-3 drinks per week group.  This elminates people who are in recovery, and people who are just too sick to drink at all.

When light-drinkers are the baseline, the J-curve turns into a straight linear relationship – the more you drink, the higher your overall mortality for the period under study. Alcohol consumption is associated with increased risk of death from stroke, heart disease, cancer, and “external causes” (like car crashes and bar fights).

Now, since this is epidemiological evidence, we should not take it too seriously anyway. No causal relationship has been demonstrated between alcohol and increased mortality rates, and other factors could sway results – for instance, less affluent people tend to drink more, and less affluent people tend to have higher mortality rates.

But this is an odd case where the evidence – regardless of how we assess the validity of the evidence – most strongly suggests an interpretation that is the opposite of the popular interpretation.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Are alcoholic beverages good for you?

  1. Simon Pryor says:

    This is absolute nonsense. Study after study, including the one you cite, has deliberately EXCLUDED former alcoholic drinkers and those with serious illness in its analysis. In fact, the prestigious Harvard Health Proffessionals Study compared only lifetime teetotallers, who all ate right, exercised and didn’t smoke, with those who drink and had all equivalent lifestyle factors. They still found that those men (as they exclusively were) who drank daily had from half to a third the risk of heart attack during the study. I really could go on and cite a lot more studies in this vein, but rest assured your objections to the evidence have been baseless for many decades now, and the evidence has simply piled up in that time, if you would care to actually investigate it.

    Still, regardless of your unfounded muckraking of epidemiological studies, I can sort of understand why, in ignorance, you could lazily dismiss a massive body of diligently executed research involving hundreds of thousands of people because the conclusions are unorthodox and because ‘no causal relationship’ has been established. But what I really can’t abide, and I’m frankly pretty astounded by, is your attempt to use the statistics to say “Actually, this study proves that moderate drinking is bad for you”. No matter what prejudices you come into the study with, you must look at the evidence for what it can tell you, not how to twist it irrevocably with logical fallacies to prove the opposite of what the science says. I am genuinely saddened that a person who claims to be knowledgable in science could do such a thing. Frankly, if I’d done this in science class when I was five, I’d have to go home and take a good hard look in the mirror. If this is your idea of how the scientific method works, I really can do nothing but feel sorry for you.

    • rf6307 says:

      The issue is overall mortality. Yes, small reductions in CVD risk seen in moderate drinkers. But, according to the data, moderate drinkers more likely than very light drinkers to die from other causes. For your reference, the chart showing increases in overall mortality risk included in the original post.

      Personally, I drink frequently, and don’t take cohort studies – like the kind we are arguing about now – very seriously. I would, however, refrain from telling friends and family that there is strong evidence that moderate drinking is good for you.

  2. rf6307 says:

    If you want more on this, a year after this post the BBC wrote this

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s